Alex Lindsay, American Leatherman 2009
There has been a lot of discussion of late regarding the impact that the selection of Tyler McCormick, who is transgendered, as IML will have on the leather community. The specific question we asked was: How will the selection of a disabled and transgendered man impact IML and the leather community? There have been articles and emails, conversations, and arguments. We also expected that there would be a certain degree of ambivalence in this poll, and that was clearly the case.
The second and third most popular choices - statistically tied at (26.1% and 26.5%) are the perfect evidence of this bipolarity. On the one hand we have a quarter or respondents indicating that IML is now representative of the entire community, and on the other an equal number who state that IML no longer represents them.
In my opinion, this is a reflection of a philosophical rift that has been growing in intensity within the leather community—whether we should be working toward greater inclusiveness, or if we need to protect our individual identities. This is not to state that one or the other is the right direction for the community, simply that they appear to be beliefs held by comparably sized groups. This is an area in which there is already ongoing discussion in various quarters. I believe that we are seeing this reflected as well in events that are being produced - a quick look through the Facebook event calendar for the community will show a large number of events with a very broad target audience, not particularly geared toward men or women as an example. It will also show a growing number of events with a very narrow target. The number of events geared toward specific fetishes is increasing, and these are often targeted toward men only. We are simultaneously becoming a melting pot and a federation of homogeneous focused interest groups.
Continue reading "Leatherati Poll - Impact of a Transgender IML " »



Recent Comments